Follow-up Comment #2, task #15146 (project administration): Hello Ineiev,
thanks for your feedback * Re pefile: I addressed this issue to the author <https://github.com/erocarrera/pefile/issues/251>, waiting for an answer. Given that this project accepts patches without requiring a CLR, I dont't see a relevant issue here. * Re dis3: Sorry for pointing you to an incomplete homepage. As I now found out the project code moved to <https://github.com/KeyWeeUsr/python-dis3/> which includes the LICENSE file. Beside this, "License: MIT / PSF." is quite clear to me since this is a "Python 2.7 backport of the "dis" module from Python 3.5+". The later is part of Python and published under the Python Software Foundation (PSF) license. Thus the "PSF" stands for the PSF license (also stated in `setup.py`. Since both MIT and PSF are OSI approved, it should not matter how exactly. * Re "free software": I just fixed this and also checked the web-site. * Re "GNU/Linux": We already started using "GNU/Linux" quite some time ago, see e.g. <https://pyinstaller.readthedocs.io/en/v3.4/CHANGES.html>. I took the chance to change the remaining occurrences of "Linux" in the documentation. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?15146> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
