Follow-up Comment #26, task #15221 (project administration): Yes. But as I mentioned before, "This is intentional: users clone this branch, define their own project's "master" branch, and keep their project's infra-structure updated by pulling from the "template" branch when they want."
This is a unique project. It does run with no modifications. But its raw output <https://gitlab.com/makhlaghi/reproducible-paper-output/raw/master/paper.pdf> is useless. its users are not just passive runners of the code. Its users must actively customize it from the start. They do this customization in the source code, but on the "master" branch they create them selves. In other words we want the users to be able to follow common conventions. Is there a problem with not having a master branch on Savannah? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?15221> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/
