Follow-up Comment #14, task #15711 (project administration): [comment #13 comment #13:] > Thank you! > > Now, in terms of Savannah hosting, "to work" for a package implies having valid copyright and license notices in all copyrightable files; in this sense, your included dependencies don't work. > > Do you see my point?
No, I don't understand. There are the LICENSE files in every subfolder for different sources (the root contains the MIT license for my sources, mariadbpp has the BOOST license notification, and pybind11 contains Wenzel Jakob's BSD-style license). I hope that all these licenses allow us to use their code without modification. According to https://savannah.nongnu.org/maintenance/ValidNotices/ I need to cover my own source files by some license notification. In my case it is the MIT one. Do I also need to change the included dependencies files by addition of legal notices to each of them? Does it violate their licence terms? I prefer to untouched sources of dependencies. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?15711> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/
