Update of task #15939 (project administration):
Status: None => In Progress
Assigned to: None => ineiev
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #4:
[comment #1 comment #1:]
> However, if anyone else makes a release, it will have the wrong identifier
"GPL-3.0-only".
This is confusing. Probably you would be better off if you didn't use this
feature.
[comment #3 comment #3:]
>
> Also, another thing I just thought of: The documentation is under the same
license as the rest of the project (GPLv3+), which is incompatible with the
GFDL. But the documentation is inline with the code (POD), so does this
matter? It would be kind of a pain to specify different licensing terms for
different things in the same file.
>
> I found [https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/bobot another
...
>line 131
<https://cvs.savannah.nongnu.org/viewvc/bobot/BoBot/BoBot.pl?view=markup#l131>).
Manuals should be licensed in a way compatible with the GFDL. Whether the
inline documentation qualifies as a manual---it depends on the contents of
that documentation. For this case, I think the documentation is short enough,
so it's OK to release it just under the GPL.
> (Incidentally, the license notices for BoBot claim that it is part of the
GNU project, but the Savannah project page
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/bobot> states otherwise.)
This should be fixed. Please contact the developers.
Do your other packages registered on Savannah have these issues?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?15939>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/
