Follow-up Comment #3, task #15934 (project administration): [comment #2 comment #2:] > [comment #1 comment #1:] > > and didn't list all your dependencies. Please do. > > There are 2 types of dependencies: > > 1. External binaries: > > - https://github.com/Aorimn/dislocker (GPL2; executed only as separate binary, and its functionality is optional, to handle Bitlocker-encrypted NTFS filesystems) ...
Please don't say "Licensed under the GPL2", https://www.gnu.org/licenses/identify-licenses-clearly.html > - standard Linux userland binaries (cat, mv, mount etc.) This wording doesn't comply with our hosting requirements. Savannah is the forge of the GNU Project, and we require that people give us due credit <https://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html> when hosting their packages here. > > Will the licensing of the result be compatible with Savannah hosting requirements? (By the way, do you understand well what they are?) > > "To be hosted on Savannah, your project must be free software, and it must be kept independent of any nonfree software. (...)" > > Yes, it will be compatible. This is more about dependencies rather than licensing; Savannah has more strict licensing requirements, e.g. the package must be GPL-compatible. I think I should ask you read our hosting requirements again, carefully. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?15934> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/
