Follow-up Comment #3, task #16099 (project administration):
[comment #2 comment #2:]
> Where do you find something said to be under a BSD license?... Do you ask
the question about CMake?
Yes. I'm sorry I wasn't clear enough.
> I found new BSD license for it on Wikipedia, but it is a widely known
dependency, that is packaged by Debian and Trisquel GNU/Linux and not newly,
so it should not be a problem.
Nothing of this means that it shouldn't be a problem. For example, software
under the Original BSD license like OpenSSL (the release series older than
3.0) was also packaged by Trisquel GNU/Linux and Debian, and of course it was
on Wikipedia (which includes articles about many proprietary programs, by the
way), however, it was problematic.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16099>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/
