Follow-up Comment #4, task #16104 (project administration): [comment #3 comment #3:] > There is no 'kissinger2ftest.pdf' in there, there's BDF.
Sorry, I meant bdf. > BDF is based on a text-like format, and the copyright notice in there is simply "public domain". I see no such text there. Please distinguish copyright and license notices, those are two separate things. GNU documentation on legal matters <https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Legal-Matters.html> may be useful for you. > The bdf file is generated with makekissinger2.cpp . What copyright notice would I use for public domain? There should be just a notice recording its public domain status, authors and anything else that is relevant, https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Non_002dFSF_002dCopyrighted-Package.html#Non_002dFSF_002dCopyrighted-Package https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Notices.html#Copyright-Notices > Also, some other public domain licenses like the Unlicense and CC0 also have a warranty disclaimer. So why wouldn't that be compatible in this case? The Unlicense and CC0 aren't licenses at all, they are public domain dedications, https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#Unlicense However, you are right, the Unlicense does contain such disclaimers (CC0 doesn't); probably this is acceptable. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16104> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/
