Follow-up Comment #36, task #16067 (project administration):
Can someone---anyone---please approve Dezyne right now and can we
discuss any details, the utter brokenness of this process, and any
changes to the guidelines and documentation later?
>> So from a Dezyne point of view, the discussion was
>> resolved.
>
> From evaluator's point of view, it hasn't been resolved yet; it makes
little
> sense to post here until the private discussion is over.
Sorry for posting here again if that is inappropiate.
More than 10 days ago I have seen an email rehashing minor details that
were already discussed to death and deemed OK. So I guess you are
asking us to trust that fruitful discussions are taking place elsewhere
(wondering about what, though)? Because I haven't seen anything going
on for quite some time now (again!). Also, I sure hope that GNU/FSF
will hurry up with making their processes---such as these---more
transparent.
As you can probably understand, we are getting requests about the
progress, the ETA and the timeline of hosting a package on Savannah and
I am not sure what to say (other than: it should not have taken more
than a few days to a week at most). Some have even started to question
our sincerity of opening up the Dezyne sources and development process,
and the wisdom of choosing Savannah.
Greetings,
Janneke
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16067>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/
