Follow-up Comment #10, task #16199 (project administration): Here is the link to license my package ( https://github.com/yevrowl/dicend ) − https://github.com/yevrowl/dicend/blob/main/LICENSE
[comment #9 комментарий №9:] > > Thought about it and this is what came up with: > > - the program is written in QB64, the license is LGPLv2.1 ( https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.txt ) > > - DOS port compiled in FreeBASIC - GNU GPLv2+ license ( https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt ) > > - images saved in Krita editor - license ( https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt ) > > Did i get it correctly? > > Not perfectly correct, but closer. It would help if you shown links to the page stating the licensing terms of the package in question; then, it's important to [//www.gnu.org/licenses/identify-licenses-clearly.html identify the licenses of packages clearly], and to see how your dependencies may affect licensing your package. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16199> _______________________________________________ Сообщение отправлено по Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/
