Follow-up Comment #3, task #16352 (project administration):
> Oh I thought I should only list the "library" dependencies.
Well, libc is a library, at least technically. You are right that the nature
of the dependency determines how its license may affect your package: if you
link to some program (even indirectly), then its license should be compatible
with the license of your software; in cases like 'make', the license of the
dependency adds no requirements to your package (but still we couldn't allow
proprietary software).
By the way, you didn't list the licenses of your dependencies.
> And the license, it was my mistake. It is licensed under GPL version 3.0+.
The tarball I submitted includes a copy of the license.
Never mind; the right option wasn't shown to you due to a bug in HTML (fixed
now both for your package and for new submissions).
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16352>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/
