Follow-up Comment #79, task #16584 (group administration):
> I'd like to also assume that you value your users' freedom and convenience as
> well, don't you?
I advocate GNU and FSF's value. I do respect users' freedom and convenience.
> Now, if you use the GFDL, you should assume that your users will want to
> redistribute those documents printed—after all, the GFDL includes a lot of
> provisions about it. And then they will be allowed to do that unmodified if
> the GFDL is included in the document and they'll have to modify the document
> to include the GFDL if it isn't.
Yes, sir/madam. I understand.
> If you care about being on the safe side, you can follow the guidelines
> literally and add a section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License" to each
> document in question.
Okay, I did the following alterations on the newest tarball.
I added GFDL license to ./README, ./NOTICE and ./Examples/README.
(file #56660)
_______________________________________________________
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: StoneValley.tar Size: 940KiB
<https://file.savannah.nongnu.org/file/StoneValley.tar?file_id=56660>
AGPL NOTICE
These attachments are served by Savane. You can download the corresponding
source code of Savane at
https://savannah.nongnu.org/source/savane-f13d333523abc00b8bb10e20cbe61e83bc26ec2a.tar.gz
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16584>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
