Follow-up Comment #6, task #16658 (group administration): [comment #5 comment #5:] > If a file is generated automatically, it doesn't mean it isn't copyrightable, > does it?
Correct, it isn't copyrightable. >> - reuse, <https://github.com/fsfe/reuse-tool>, Apache-2.0 AND CC0-1.0 AND >> CC-BY-SA-4.0 AND GPL-3.0-or-later > > Could you explain what this means? The "AND" operator means that compliance with multiple licenses is needed. I got this license expression with `dnf info` which seems to show overly verbose license expressions, possibly generated from per-file license data. I'm more awake now, so I now know that "Apache-2.0" (permissive) and "CC0-1.0" (public domain) are redundant because they are compatible with GPL. Also I now noticed that there's a non-GPL-compatible license "CC-BY-SA-4.0". I looked at the project's README, and it says that this license is for the documentation. My project does not require installing the documentation. In conclusion, this dependency is GPL-3.0-or-later. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16658> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
