Follow-up Comment #19, task #16685 (group administration): [comment #18 comment #18:] >>> noted . completed. json files also have copyright and license headers in >>> data directory. in ai directory have placed a README with list of files >>> applicable.
If files contain copyright and license notices, README is not needed. And in
particular, ai/data/README.md says that the files are under GPLv3+ while, for
example, ai/data/ai_models_training_guide.md says it's under GFDL v1.3+.
Similarly, DATA_LICENSE.md says about binary files without listing them.
Also, files like README.md says that a copy of its license is included in the
section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License" but no such section is
present in the file.
Could you fix such inconsistencies?
By the way, I wonder if it makes sense to attach a patch against the latest
tarball instead of uploading a complete tarball again.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16685>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
