Hi list, hi Gim, Nice to see you play with the bug tracker. But I think this list is better for this kind of comments, not directly related to fixing bugs -- especially when you talk about one bug in an other bug's entry.
First, I learned something on the double-fork trick, thanks to you. Indeed, one for is enough if the initial process exits immediately, and that's what happens with ocaml-dtools currently. Regarding the labels of log messages, this is an interesting question. At first only the "static" label was there, and I really wanted some (not so) "dynamic" information. Maybe I should have put it in the message itself, it just seemed simpler like this at that time. I might change this now. Any opinion ? By the way, another question related to ocaml-dtools. Users (we _do_ have a few users) have complained about the timestamps in dtools logs. They don't know about logrider, which isn't installed. They simply want to be comfortable with the usual tools. Even though I know about the logrider, I still prefer (and do) use the usual tools. I made a modification to ocaml-dtools to add a new option "log.timestamps.raw" which defaults to false. When true, the timestamps are raw, as currently. When false, they are as follows: 2006/06/02 16:05:23 [threads:3] Scheduler wakes up Any opinion about that ? Should I commit that change ? Cheers. -- David
