Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Monday 20 April 2009 09:47:10 Romain Beauxis, vous avez écrit :
>>> A quick look at the code shows that it does not handle end of tracks and
>>> moreover it beaks temporality. But I don't think there is a deep reason
>>> to hide it if the first point is fixed.
>> Indeed. I checked, it does not preserve end of tracks and loose metadata..
>> ! I will try to fix this soon...
> 
> Ok, I have done it.
> 
> Additionally, I wonder if perhaps we could also pass some informations like 
> this (break temporality) in the new type system that we are planning...
> 
> However, it should perhaps not be an error but a warning.. For instance, 
> composing resample with harbor can have an expected good behaviour: 
> compensate 
> drifts in the buffer...

A quick fix to start with would be to add a flag Lang.Breaks_temporality
for operators...

++

Sam.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and 
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. 
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
Savonet-devl mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-devl

Répondre à