2011/10/25 David Baelde <david.bae...@gmail.com>: > 2011/10/25 Romain Beauxis <to...@rastageeks.org>: >> We'll need is to not decode encoded data unless necessary (type >> system, althout track_sensitive in switches and the like may cause >> some trouble..) > > It's not only track insensitive switches that cause trouble. If there > is sharing, a track sensitive switch could switch to a source in the > middle of a track, in which case there's no guarantee that it is > aligned with an encoded chunk. This seems just too constraining to me.
Sharing is typically a case where decoding would have to occur. The more I think about it, the more I believe it all boils down to have some kind of lazy decoding strategy where if everything goes ok from source to output (including output's encoding format matching encoded data's format) then nothing is decoded.. No need for changing types and the like but just work at operators and source level.. Romain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Savonet-devl mailing list Savonet-devl@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-devl
