Hello again,

> I find the id3tag (not taglib, my mistake) much more reliable than
> ocaml-mp3id3 which I haven't used for a long time. I'm not sure
> that both are attempted if both are available. No time to check right
> now, anyway if I were you I'd compile with taglib alone.

I'll check it as soon as possible to give feedback ;)

> If you use an fallible playlist instead of playlist.safe, it would
> also skip the invalid of inexistent files, playing the next
> available one instead. The only risk is that it takes a bit of time to > try 
> and fail on several erroneous files, causing liquidsoap to move to > a 
> fallback source. I wonder if this would happen often in practice,
> my guess is that one would need a really very broken list in order to
> make playlist() fail. I guess I should run experiments.

your are right, only after many errors the source stops, but STOPS.  

> At the beginning we had no idea what people were really using and
> what they really needed, we just did something for us. Now I just love
> to receive mails from users telling me that liquidsoap is really
> useful !

It happens when you are involved in the open source movement ;) are you moving 
to GPL 3 ?

> By the way, is your radio public ? would you send us any pointer ?
> Advertisement of liquidsoap radios is welcomed here ;)

you can check the radios at http://www.orbitel.net.co

The icons in the bottom are outsourced clients: melodie, zapepelele and 
herbario are ACTUALLY using liquidsoap. The others will be moved to liquidsoap 
in the next days.


out of topic... is everybody french here?    

Best wishes


Jorge

-------------------------------------
Saca tu propia cuenta de email gratis en Colombia entrando a 
http://mail.conexcol.com

Reply via email to