Hi ! Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 22:29:12, Chris Everest a écrit : > So i started looking into building a Fedora RPM of liquidsoap.
Thanks for this work, this is a great news ! > I keep > finding myself compiling (yuk) and have even resorted to running > virtual Ubuntu instances, to make the liquidsoap install less painful. > So here's my question: > > 1.) Do I need to split out lame dependencies (et al non-free library > dependencies) to have this RPM distributed by the liquidsoap project? Clearly no. The stable and daily build packages are built directly from the full set of dependencies without individual packages. The problem can be for external dependencies like ocaml-pcre if they are not packaged for Fedora. In any way, you can distribute a binary package of liquidsoap without the need to also package the external dependencies that we ship. > 2.) Maybe Axel from atrpms would dist? Or rpm fusion. I don't know > how those orgs operate. I don't know. For reaching the most users as possible, it is always better to distribute the packages there and not in the project's website. I don't know how these sites work, though. In particular, you'd probably have to also package the dependencies in this case. Romain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
