Hi,

Not really.

The drop issue occurs only when I set a big buffer and it's set  
because I have bad internet connection and I don't want to have any  
audio problem due to the small lost of connection which occur from  
time to time in my internet access.

Anyway, since I'm currently using mplayer (and, consequently, having  
no backup playlist in case of blank), it's indeed better to solve this  
issue first (since I still cannot use my first system with metadata.)



Simon

Le 13 Jan 2010 à 22:36, Romain Beauxis a écrit :

>       Hi again !
>
> Le mardi 12 janvier 2010 09:09:12, Simon Renquin a écrit :
>> I was using the same script with the folowing input.http options :
>> "buffer=3., max=320." on a local icecast server which had the
>> equivalenent of 3 seconds of burst and 320 seconds of queue size.
>> Everything is running fine if I'm using VLC as reader but the
>> liquidsoap script is completely lost.  It reads the buffer much more
>> faster by dropping some part of the stream.  Weirder, it also can  
>> come
>> back in time and re-read  pasts packet.  The same problem occurs if
>> I'm using a 300 seconds buffer with equivalent burst.
>
> I think I remember having some troubles with a big buffer. Generally  
> speaking,
> liquidsoap proceeds in real-time the smaller the buffer is the  
> better it is.
>
> I guess you want a big buffer because of the drop issue that you also
> described. Perhaps we could start with this issue first ?
>
>
> Romain


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Savonet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users

Reply via email to