Hi David, I could use fail2ban, and I'm currently trying to use it (doing a very stable regex), but it's hard in some case. Like mine, where I have several liq process and a logfile for each one in different directories.
The all-info patch is good for me. We don't necessarily need more infos. Or we could do the both and active one of these option if we want. For the distinction, I think the pid is good, no ? In the case of multiple failure, harbor won't let access to the server anymore. And if we want to remove the IP adress, we could do a telnet command or juste restart the script. Tell me what you think about it Le 26/06/2010 18:29, David Baelde a écrit : > Hi guys, > > It is possible to use custom authentication functions, which could be > useful here: write a function that, when asked too often, says no all > the time for a while. But this will still not be a very lightweight > mechanism, perhaps not enough to avoid flood attacks. If fail2ban does > not work easily, then we should do our best in liquidsoap to avoid > such problems. > > Regarding syslog, I'm happily surprised to see more people interested. > But help us design it: do you necessarily want labels (INFO, WARN, > etc) or would you be happy with the current all-INFO patch? How to > distinguish different liquidsoap instances: PID, name of the script? > > Cheers, > > David > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
