Davit, I know I could get it working on another distro, but what fun is that? MOST of the problems I encountered required installing needed RPM's from one of three repos(rpmforge, EPEL, or karan.org's RPM site). I was able to get last version of liquidsoap installed on CentOS and I'm determined to get this one working too. :)
Still fighting my way through my Monday morning to find a few minutes to dig back into this. thanks On 10/11/2010 10:06 AM, Davit Barbakadze wrote: > I wasn't able to compile on CentOS. I do not remember encountering > your error, but there were lot's of others. One of which on the very > last stage has knocked me out (something related to the impossibility > to get ocaml http libs). So I'm running it on Fedora now. > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Maxwell Rathbone > <[email protected]> wrote: >> David, >> >> Thanks for the quick response. For what it's worth, this is a fresh >> install of CentOS 5.5 (running inside a VirtualBox container). >> Liquidsoap was literally the first and only thing to be installed on >> this OS. :) If I recall correctly, a default install of CentOS does >> leave a couple things installed that hint to X11. I'll try removing >> those this morning and recompiling to see if perhaps I can get it to >> think that I don't have X11 installed. :) (I definitely don't) >> >> I'll also check out liquidsoap's configure to see if I can track down >> any mentions of the Graphics package or SDL. >> >> I'll reply back a little later with what I find. >> >> thanks! >> >> Max >> >> On 10/11/2010 4:11 AM, David Baelde wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 8:41 AM,<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I was able to work through quite a few problems the >>>> install through at me, >>> Good on you! >>> >>>> but this one absolutely has be stuck: >>>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11 >>> OK, it seems that the build system figured that you need X11 (xorg) >>> but you probably don't have it on your server. I built liquidsoap >>> recently on a server without X11 installed, so it should be possible. >>> What we need to do is figure what caused this... Could it be that the >>> Graphics or SDL package have been detected? This would show up in >>> liquidsoap's configure. No other idea for now unfortunately :\ >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> David >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports >> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2& L3. >> Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great >> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb >> _______________________________________________ >> Savonet-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
