Hi Martin, 2011/4/28 Martin Konečný <[email protected]>: > I've been looking through the API, through the fade functions, and they all > seem to only support fading-out if you define the fade-out point before > hand. Perhaps a new operator is required here? Is there any existing > solution that works by fading out the current track instead of the current > stream?
If you want to fade out when you skip, there must be some buffering somewhere: you can't remove the data suddenly and ask for something smooth. That kind of buffering is provided by the conservative modes of some operators. I think you should be able to build a solution using cross() (although it's a bit of an overkill because you don't need to cross): if no skipped was performed, use a sequence transition, but if a skip was performed, you can use a fade out in the transition and it'll work nicely if you have set conservative=true. Tell me how this works for you, -- David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
