I agree! Unfortunately, I just don't have the storage space right now.
Hopefully, I can get sponsorship or contributions to pay for the kind of
storing I would need. Right now, I just want to get my community off the
ground, and I'm working with what I have.

Maybe I should go with a minimum of 100 KB/sec for now. I believe I can
just write my .liq scripts in such a way as to ensure an infallible
fallback and make that fallback a small playlist of local files rather
than one file (how do I do that, by the way?)

Damien

On 09/24/11 16:29, okay_awright wrote:
> Hello,
>
> IMHO it's terribly risky to rely on something like that. I believe
> Intranet, in a controlled environment, is alright though.
> Maybe you should cache those files for offline use: do only make them
> available for playing when they've been successfully downloaded
> somewhere in your own Intranet first, especially if you rely on a
> non-professional distant storage service for your downloads. If you
> let Liquidsoap handle the caching of the files on-the-fly it will be
> too late when something bad happens.
>
> HTH
>
> On 24/09/2011 17:36, Audiodef Online wrote:
>> I'm in the process of setting up radio streams via liquidsoap that use
>> playlists consisting entirely of remote files. I could use some advice
>> on a particular point.
>>
>> There's one site with a lot of music that I would like to add to my
>> streams, but unfortunately will have to pass, because this site has a
>> lot of large files (which is not a show-stopper) and appears to have a
>> slow connection (large files PLUS slow connection... not so keen on
>> that). Files are downloaded at an average of 30 KB/sec from this site. I
>> have FIOS, so I know it's not my connection that's slow.
>>
>> I'm wondering where I should put my cutoff. Obviously, it should be
>> above 30 KB/sec. This is really slow. Should I make it 100 KB/sec? 500?
>> 1 MB/sec? This will help me later when I allow community members to
>> recommend new material for the radio streams, at which point I mosey
>> over to the recommendation and see how fast the connection is on that
>> site.
>>
>> I hope this makes sense.
>>
>> Damien
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
>> valuable.
>> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
>> security
>> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
>> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
>> _______________________________________________
>> Savonet-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________
Savonet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users

Reply via email to