Hi David,
thanks for answering.
On Oct 10, 2011, at 4:38 PM, David Baelde wrote:
> Could it be that the fallback([jingle,playlist]) is finishing the
> track from playlist before moving on to the jingle? If so, you may
> just need fallback.skip() around that (in place of your current
> switch, which will require moving the time predicates to a new layer)
> so that tracks are finished when switching away from them.
I didn't understand the fallback.skip part that you wrote but I thing that the
case is that the playlist source does not get skipped, so the next time a
fallback get available by the switch it plays one track of playlist first. So I
was reading the documentation about fallback.skip, source.skip, sequence,
switch, transitions until ... I got lost (- there were comments about a book
recently...)
So while I continue searching documentation maybe some more help could come to
clear things up :)
In the code:
radio = fallback([switch([
({ 0h-12h30m }, fallback([delay(900.,jingle1), playlist1])),
({ 12h30m-24h }, fallback([delay(900.,jingle2), playlist2]))]),
default])
- how do I make sure that the sources playlist1 and playlist2 are going to be
"skipped" when the fallbacks become unavailable by the switch()?
Thanks a lot in advance,
Kyriakos
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Savonet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
