Hi Henry, I haven't had time to fully read and reflect on your recent mails, but I can answer this for now.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Henry Favretto <[email protected]> wrote: > Curiously, when is the fade-out supposed to start? Does it depend on the > start_next parameter or > rather on the duration of the fade-out, e.g. counting backwards from the > track ending? With fade.out() the fade starts when liquidsoap sees that the end of track is in D seconds, where D is the duration parameter. So it relies on remaining time estimations. With fade.final(), which I often use for transitions, the fade starts immediately, and kills the source when the fade is over (if the track hasn't ended before that). It is quite possible that remaining time estimations changed a little bit, but I don't think there should be too much difference. In any case, using fade.final() sounds like a good idea in your case and could "fix" your problem. Cheers, -- David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
