It's strange that the newer packages Liquidsoap depends on would induce a
2x increase in CPU time.

I think Debian package maintainers would be interested if you filed a bug
with your findings.

Martin

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Renaud <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 08/09/12 19:03, Romain Beauxis wrote:
>
>> 2012/8/9 Renaud <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>    Hi!
>>
>>  I've been testing Liquidsoap 1.0.0 for some time now.
>>> I've made some tests with the latest version from the sourceforge
>>> repository (1.0.1) and I've been comparing it to the Debian Package on
>>> the official wheezy repositories (1.0.0-4) and I noticed a huge
>>> performance gap between those two.
>>> With the 1.0.1 I compiled, I could barely run 150 liquidsoap processes,
>>> with the 1.0.0-4 from the Debian repos, I could run 245 easily.
>>> I then tried the 1.0.1 package on the Debian Sid repositories (because I
>>> I thought my compilation was at fault) and I noticed the exact same
>>> performance gap.
>>>
>>> Is that behavior considered as normal regarding the code changes between
>>> those versions ?
>>> Do you need more data from me (or me to do specific tests) to try and
>>> understand this ?
>>>
>> I don't think that liquidsoap 1.0.1 introduced any change that would
>> induce a performance loss compared to 1.0.0. I would instead look for
>> the architecture, compiler and encoding libraries that you are using.
>>
>> In particular, most processing time it spent encoding, so you should
>> look first at (I suppose) the libmp3lame used in each case. What
>> version? What provider? What compilation options? etc..
>>
>> BTW, you may also want to test our new fixed-point mp3 encoder:
>>    https://github.com/savonet/**shine <https://github.com/savonet/shine>
>> It is supported in the latest HG repository and I suspect that it can
>> lead to small improvements that would be significant when scaling up.
>>
>> Romain
>>
>>  Hello Romain,
>
> Indeed, I upgraded the packages containing the plugins when I upgraded to
> Liquidsoap 1.0.1 (I've only used official Debian repositories, wheezy and
> sid, for my tests).
> I'm using Lame to encode, I might try shine as I've seen it's working
> beautifully on the Raspberry. :)
>
> Thanks for the tips !
>
> Renaud
>
>


-- 
Open source radio in the cloud. Get yours now! ---> http://airtime.pro

Martin Konecny
Software Developer, Sourcefabric
[email protected]

720 Bathurst St. Suite 203
M5S 2R4, Toronto, ON, Canada
+1 (416) 892-8420 (Cell)
Skype: martin.konecny15

http://www.sourcefabric.org
http://www.twitter.com/Sourcefabric
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Savonet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users

Reply via email to