Ok, I'll be the first one to vote :) Since it's better to avoid number 2.0 I'll avoid it. I gave "2 points" for starting from 2.1 to mark the fact that it is a release after many-many years. However there were little changes in SVN for many years, so I understand the point from other people, that we shouldn't jump instantly above 2, and stay close to current release number 1.3.
Anyway - let's see what this voting will show. Perhaps a version numbering conflict, like newer version has lower number than an older version (-: > Voting chart: > > #1 : current SVN > #2 : with patches > #3 : with something new inside > > # | 5 points | 3 points | 2 points | 1 point | > ---+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > 1 | 1.4 | | 2.1 | 1.3.1 | > ---+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > 2 | 1.5 | | 2.2 | | > ---+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > 3 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 2.3 | | > ---+------------+------------+------------+------------+ -- Janek Kozicki |
