On Dec 21, 2007 3:52 PM, Robert Personen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I could have sworn that sawfish has it's own lib-exec directory for > lisp code and compiled modules. I am not currently at my computer so > I can only speculate. Have you tried some sort of --lib-exec flag? > It is also possible that sawfish is auto-detecting where librep is and > installing modules into librep's libexec directory.
Seems i need to dig the autotools documentation then. > This does raise the question, how would we want sawfish to interact > with librep? Should it be a set of modules and lisp code that is > installed into a librep system (the sawfish executable being a > "#!/usr/bin/rep" script) or is it a separate program that embeds > librep? I don't know what would be the best approach. I can hack rep code with ease, changing the load path, without touching the installed version, but for mangling the C code i thought i needed two separate instances to keep things sane... -- Andrea
