Scott Scriven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looking at the mailing list today, I saw people mentioning things
> like "patches in the wiki" or patches floating around in
> bugzilla. I'm guessing this is because sawfish uses svn, and
> it's a centralized revision system.
And it uses the Gnome svn repository, where most of the current
Sawfish developers don't have write access.
> Is there any change of moving sawfish to a distributed revision
> control system?
I am using git-svn, but I worry that if everybody used git-svn clone
independently, they might get non-identical conversions from svn to
git and would not be able to share patches directly. I don't know how
easy or hard it is to avoid divergence in the conversion. If it is
difficult, an official get-svn clone would be useful: then anyone
could just fetch it with regular git and only the maintainer of the
official clone would need to use git-svn.
> It would probably help with all the patch
> management, and make it easier for people to contribute.
A problem with the wiki is that there is sort of a reasonable patch
size. Very small things like typos don't get fixed, because they are
not worth the hassle to set up a wiki page, and very big things don't
get fixed because the changes would be too big for a single patch.
--
Timo Korvola <URL:http://www.iki.fi/tkorvola>
