On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:55:31PM +0100, Christopher Bratusek wrote: > On the other hand so or so _no_ distro, that is not dead or > ancient, does ship XFree86 anymore ... so I'm not for adding > checks back. any comments on this?
Well, at least RHEL 4.x/CentOS 4.x, and with 3.x still beeing maintained so these will be around for a while and surely not dead, are using XFree86. How relevant is that here is another question but you asked. I have no idea what else but interfaces have a nasty habit of sticking around much longer than you expected. > We also have a .spec file inside the source-dir, so there's no > reason to reject an ebuild. That sawfish.spec.in has the last changelog entry from "Tue Jun 12 2000" so it may have some issues. The one which I am using "for real" is somewhat different; not entirely but ... Michal
