On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: > thanks for pointing it out, but we do check for smlib, we just did not > define that symbol, so here's a better patch (also replaced some can't > with can not, produces ugly syntax highlighting in editors, no > functionality change)...
OK. One small point: "can not" is not idiomatic English, "cannot" is better. Allin Cottrell
