Am Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:21:14 +0200 schrieb Timo Korvola <[email protected]>:
> On Tuesday 17 November 2009 18:17:01 Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: > > hmm, now there I'm reading this i realize it, too. Any better > > solution in mind? > > Using a session manager. Implementing a session manager inside > Sawfish would appear difficult and futile. It would be better for > the session manager to be a standalone program. The deprecated > WM_SAVE_YOURSELF protocol could perhaps be implemented in Sawfish > without too much difficulty, but supporting only an obsolete protocol > also seems pointless. > > > On the other hand, when you manually close a > > session, normally only stuff like pager, tray, panel, desklets are > > running, the rest is closed by you before that. That's why I choose > > delete-window-safely, as it would be enough for that windows. > > Do they need even that? > Well, eg. the screenlets loose newly set settings then not closed properly. But for the majority it may not make a difference. Something like lxsession in a basic form for sawfish would be the best solution. If someone is willing to volounteer that for 3.0 (as extra package) Chris
