Hi. On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:27:41 +0100, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: > Am Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:40:45 +0900 (JST) > schrieb Teika Kazura <[email protected]>: > >> * Command group is 'exit sawfish'?
Sorry, I wanted to say (defgroup exit "Exit Sawfish" :group misc). >> * Func & command 'exit' is so confusing with 'quit'. But what'll be >> good? > [...] I think that exit is good, because: > > quit = close an application (see "Quit/Close Application" term) > exit = close the session (see "Exit Session" term) Who can distinguish the function (quit) which kills sawfish from (exit)? (If 'quit' had been named 'raw-quit', then there were no problem, but we can *never* rename this core function. ;) > exit-session is not optimal, as it may also be: > exit-session-and-suspend or exit-session-and-reboot and so on, so we > need something that is valid for all 5 cases exit may be used for. But I insist that exit-session will be better than bare 'exit' by the above reason. (I'm not sure for the word "session". I don't know exactly how the word "session" is used inside the current Sawfish, and the common meaning outside of Sawfish, either. Of course it's better than my "exit-wrapper".) Regards, Teika (Teika kazura)
