Am Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:26:43 -0600 schrieb Matthew Love <[email protected]>:
> Hi all, > > I've noticed that 'string-match and 'string-looking-at both > return an error when one of the input strings is '(). 'string= > will return '() in such cases. > > It seems it would be better for 'string-match and 'string-looking-at to > also return '() if one of the input "strings" is not actually a string, > as in such cases the strings do not technically match. > > What do you think? > > I have attached a patch that will have 'string-match and > 'string-looking-at return '() if one of the input strings is not a > string. Im fairly new to c so im not sure if there is a better way > to do it. > > Cheers. > According to docs string-match and string-looking-at are only supposed to return t. So the current behaviour is a bit odd. I've added an fprintf for some info. Chris
