Gary McGraw wrote: > I'm not sure vista is bombing because of good quality. That certainly would > be ironic. > > Word on the "way down in the guts" street is that vista is too many things > cobbled together into one big kinda functioning mess. I.e. it is mis-featured, and lacks on some integration. This is a variation on not having desired features. And there certainly are big features in Vista that were supposed to be there but aren't (most of user-land being managed code, relational file system).
It is also infamously late. So if the resources that were put into the code quality in Vista had instead been put into features and ship-date, would it do better in the marketplace? Sure, that's heretical :) but it just might be true :( Crispin, now believes that users are fundamentally what holds back security -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. http://crispincowan.com/~crispin/ Director of Software Engineering http://novell.com AppArmor Training at CanSec West http://cansecwest.com/dojoapparmor.html _______________________________________________ Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com) as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community. _______________________________________________
