There is also lighttpd that is very similar to nginx.
On Jun 16, 4:25 pm, Frédéric Sidler <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is a question for the scalr dev team.
>
> There are many LB solution, Perlbal, HAProxy, Nginx. Except the fact that
> Nginx can serve static files, why was Nginx chosen between all the Load
> Balancer solution.
>
> I have never used HAProxy before. I was used to use Perlbal until Scalr came
> out. But with performance issues we are dealing with, some friends point me
> to this blog post and tell me that HAProxy could eventually solve some of
> them. As I can see algorithms of HAProxy seem to be more evolved than the
> simple round robin algorithm of
> Nginx.http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/comparing-nginx-and-hap...
>
> The advantage of Nginx and HAProxy over Perlbal is that they can deal with
> HTTPS which is not the case of Perlbal.
>
> Thank you very much for the explanation of the choice and if an HAProxy
> image would make sense.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"scalr-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/scalr-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
