instance = AMI On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:09 PM, zorrothekid <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yes but...What that I can't understand is if instances = Amazon > instances or if I can logically load balance more instances (in the > mean of system processes or daemons) on the same (Amazon virtual) > machine... > > Thx. > > On Sep 7, 2:00 pm, Arie Fishler <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would say minimal does not have to include www. Practically you can use > > elastic LB if you want to expand....no? > > > > 2009/9/7 Frédéric Sidler <[email protected]> > > > > > minimal costs for a scalable architecture are > > > > > - one www > > > - one app > > > - one mysql > > > > > + scalr fees > > > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:54 PM, zorrothekid <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> Hi, > > >> I'm calculating the cost to setup an elastic farm on EC2 that can > > >> start very small and can drive more traffic in future... > > > > >> What's the base investment in Amazon instances to effectively use > > >> Scalr? Is an AMI equal to an instance (so I can't have more AMI for > > >> one instance)? > > > > >> Thanks, > > >> ZTK. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scalr-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/scalr-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
