On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 09:03:42 AM Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> For RHEL6, I thought that system accounts were as follows:
> 
> 1 - 499 => Vendor System
> 500 - 1000 => Local System
> 1001 - 65534 => Users

Nope. The authoritative reference is /etc/logins.def. The UID_MIN is 500. I 
had this bumped up in F16, which RHEL7 will inherit from.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-May/151663.html

-Steve

 
> In this case, are we considering local system as non-system (we are, I just
> wanted to make sure that it was clear).
> 
> This numbering is reinforced by the SSSD default configuration.
>

> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Dave Smith <[email protected]
> > wrote:
> >  Great catch, please push!
> > 
> > On 11/27/2013 04:31 PM, Steinke, Leland J Sr CTR DISA FSO (US) wrote:
> > 
> > The original prose check ignored UID 500.  The associated OVAL includes
> > UID 500, though.
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Leland Steinke, Security+
> > DISA FSO Technical Support Contractor
> > tapestry technologies, Inc717-267-5797 (DSN
> > 570)[email protected] (gov't)[email protected]
> > (com'l)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > scap-security-guide mailing
> > [email protected]https://lists.fedorahosted.
> > org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > scap-security-guide mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide

_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide

Reply via email to