On 12/27/13, 1:04 PM, Maura Dailey wrote:
My local copy reports that it's correctly looking at
gconf.xml.mandatory for all 4 listed checks, git diff comes back
clean, and I only have one pending patch that I know about (fixing up
some missing service and package checks). If someone else could
confirm that there's a problem, I could reclone everything and try again.
The checks are against gconf.xml.defaults within the upstream git repo.
Perhaps you have local patches/branches laying around?
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/scap-security-guide.git/tree/RHEL/6/input/checks/gconf_gnome_screensaver_idle_activation_enabled.xml
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/scap-security-guide.git/tree/RHEL/6/input/checks/gconf_gnome_screensaver_idle_delay.xml
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/scap-security-guide.git/tree/RHEL/6/input/checks/gconf_gnome_screensaver_lock_enabled.xml
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/scap-security-guide.git/tree/RHEL/6/input/checks/gconf_gnome_screensaver_mode_blank.xml
- Maura Dailey
On 12/26/2013 02:07 PM, Shaw, Ray V CTR USARMY ARL (US) wrote:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
[Sorry for the delayed response, especially since I'm pretty sure I
opened the BZ; I've been stupidly busy at work.]
The checks still seem to be looking at gconf.xml.defaults for:
gconf_gnome_screensaver_idle_activation_enabled.xml
gconf_gnome_screensaver_idle_delay.xml
gconf_gnome_screensaver_lock_enabled.xml
gconf_gnome_screensaver_mode_blank.xml
Did something go awry with part of this patch? I do see the commit
in the git log, and the "thumbnailers" check is looking at
gconf.xml.mandatory.
--
Shawn Wells
Director, Innovation Programs
[email protected] | 443.534.0130
@shawndwells
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
