I know I'm jumping in here late but is there a suggested correct procedure for migrating users to the 1000+ range without causing mass chaos across your systems?
Just trying to see if I'm missing something obvious or it's just a case of doing it the old fashioned way. Thanks, Trevor On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Shawn Wells <sh...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 1/8/14, 10:51 AM, Shaw, Ray V CTR USARMY ARL (US) wrote: > >> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED >> Caveats: NONE >> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-May/151663.html >> >> Will UID_MIN and GID_MIN default to 1000 in RHEL7 as well? I have not >> had (and do not have, sadly) time to check out the RHEL7 beta, but a quick >> search of several of the documentation pages didn't mention this. I would >> imagine so, given things like: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907312 >> >> If so, should we expect the STIG for RHEL7 to reflect this, counting >> everything 1000 and below as a "system" account/group for relevant rules? >> Just trying to get a head start on potentially necessary UID/GID changes. >> > > Great question. Yes, they'll default to 1000 and the RHEL7 STIG will > reflect. Feel free to send in a patch if you're so inclined :) > > Admittedly things will get interesting in legacy environments which > support both RHEL6 and RHEL7. As RHEL7 progresses we'll make note of > this... perhaps issue some kind of "RHEL6 to RHEL7 migration issues" FAQ. > > _______________________________________________ > scap-security-guide mailing list > scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide > -- Trevor Vaughan Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc (410) 541-6699 tvaug...@onyxpoint.com -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --
_______________________________________________ scap-security-guide mailing list scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
