Honestly +1 here. I have pretty much all of my repos hosted under Github and their patch and review process is *easy* particularly when combined with the new Gerrit system that's free for FOSS projects.
Trevor On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Ronald <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi there, > > from a personal perspective, as a github users (read biased opinion), I've > been refrained from contributing and publishing diffs because: > - the process of patch approval was not clear, > - communication around a patch is made difficult by mail (which are > already follinwg throughout the days) > - current open issues are not listed and cannot be discussed by the > community (to propose patch for instance) > > I have the feeling that a move to github would make lots of things clear > for global collaboration. Although, the fact that the project is hosted at > fedora is a good quality stamp/branding :) > > my two cents. > > Ronald > > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Shawn Wells <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 4/8/14, 10:16 AM, Trevor Vaughan wrote: >> >>> Just out of curiosity, what happened with this in the end? >>> >>> I just noticed a few more suggestions that Github-style pull requests >>> would be really useful. >>> >> >> There were valid opinions expressed for both staying on FedoraHosted and >> migrating to GitHub. So, effectively, a stalemate. >> >> The SSG community has grown amazingly -- both in contributors and usage >> -- and because of this success Red Hat is preparing to ship SSG in future >> versions of RHEL [1]. This exacerbates the need for a manageable ticketing >> system with easy patch submission as very shortly every RHEL installation >> will have a copy of SSG. FedoraHosted simply wasn't designed to include the >> same tooling and developer ecosystem as afforded on GitHub (and that's NOT >> a ding against it's designers!). >> >> The community is a coalition of the willing. Our shared purpose drives >> the community, and I strongly feel the need to build out tools that will >> allow us to scale. I'm concerned -- likely overly so -- at how to prepare >> for a wave of interest once we begin shipping in RHEL. >> >> With that said, who am I to *mandate* the migration to GitHub? Admittedly >> part of me wants to just go ahead and do it, however that could come at >> making a non-trivial amount of people (esp. committers, who would be >> effected by the change) feel alienated/ignored. Certainly we can't make >> everyone happy all the time, though. >> >> Thoughts would be *most* welcome. >> >> >> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038655 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> scap-security-guide mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide >> > > > _______________________________________________ > scap-security-guide mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide > > -- Trevor Vaughan Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc (410) 541-6699 [email protected] -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --
_______________________________________________ scap-security-guide mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
