So, I'm late to the party. I'm voting for vertical-top followed by horizontal-top.
Trevor On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Andrew Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for horizontal, although every implementation is using too much > whitespace for logo. > > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Jan Lieskovsky <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello folks, >> >> since one image is better than thousand words, have put together couple >> of examples how it could look like: >> [1] http://jlieskov.fedorapeople.org/logos/ >> >> The rhel6-guide.html is the vanilla one (how it looks now), then the >> proposals >> are as follows (legend: filename = icon + text orientation + if the image >> is at the top or at bottom), >> e.g.: >> * rhel6-guide-horizontal-top.html - the "SCAP Security Guide" is on the >> side wrt to the logo, whole >> image is inserted at the top, >> * rhel6-guide-vertical-bottom.html - the "SCAP Security Guide" text is >> below the logo, whole image >> got inserted at the bottom of the >> guide, >> * rhel6-guide-icononly-top.html - there's just logo (no text), image got >> inserted at the top >> * ... (see the other options) >> >> All of the icons are clickable (after click should bring the user to >> SSG's Fedorahosted's home page). >> >> If you have recommendations, where else on the page the logo could be >> inserted (and which one of >> them would be the most preferred one), please share. The dimensions (w x >> h) of the included image >> can be changed yet (decreased), if there would be impression this as >> generated now it would be too big. >> >> Also, since this is just draft, I have (hard) included the PNG versions >> of the particular image. Once >> (if) we are agreed, which version would be the most preferred one, I >> would start looking how >> to modify the build process to include the images on-the-fly & optimize >> the process as much as >> possible. >> >> Last, but not least, I am aware the *-bottom.html versions of the >> examples contain >> "SCAP Security Guide https://fedorahosted.org/scap-security-guide"; at >> the top of the page >> yet (didn't change this, since these are just drafts how the new guides >> could look like). >> >> Please vote / share your opinions, which of the versions you like the >> most (even if it should >> be the current / vanilla / not-changed one) with short argumentation why. >> >> Thank you && Regards, Jan. >> -- >> Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Technologies Team >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Shawn Wells" <[email protected]> >> > To: "SCAP Security Guide" <[email protected]> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 1:40:32 PM >> > Subject: Re: [RFC] SCAP Security Guide icon to be included into HTML >> guides generated by SSG? >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > (Especially since users can change w/local style sheets if desired) >> > >> > -- >> > Shawn Wells >> > Director, Innovation Programs >> > [email protected] | 443.534.0130 >> > @shawndwells >> > >> > On Jun 3, 2014, at 7:11 AM, Greg Elin < [email protected] > >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > I recommend going with the powered by approach on all output so SSG logo >> > always present. >> > >> > Default company logo could be a "logo here" light gray placeholder >> image. >> > >> > Greg >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Jan Lieskovsky < [email protected] > >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Hello folks, >> > >> > since (for now [if we ever will]) we didn't change the name of the >> project, >> > and will keep the SCAP Security Guide one, and since we have received >> icons >> > for both of the alternatives (renaming to OpenSCAP SG, or staying with >> > current >> > name) of the project name, would like to check with you the following: >> > >> > Would the community want the SCAP Security Guide icon to be included in >> the >> > HTML version of the guide (for particular products), the SSG product >> creates >> > within the build process? Also, would we want this icon to be included >> on >> > the project wiki pages? >> > >> > Or would we rather want to stay with current position, having wiki page >> & >> > corresponding HTML guides vendor neutral, so they can be modified >> (according >> > to the subsequent needs) afterwards? >> > >> > Opinions for SVG icon inclusion / against it appreciated. >> > >> > Thank you && Regards, Jan. >> > -- >> > Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Technologies Team >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > scap-security-guide mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > scap-security-guide mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > scap-security-guide mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> scap-security-guide mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide >> > > > _______________________________________________ > scap-security-guide mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide > > -- Trevor Vaughan Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc (410) 541-6699 [email protected] -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --
_______________________________________________ scap-security-guide mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
