----- Original Message ----- > From: "Trey Henefield" <trey.henefi...@ultra-ats.com> > To: "SCAP Security Guide" <scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org> > Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 2:33:28 PM > Subject: RE: New report and guide in openscap 1.1.0 > > Yes I did see that, which I also thought was very useful. What I was > referring to was not the ability to filter the overall results, but the > details in each check. > > So in the linked report, for the check titled “Verify that All World-Writable > Directories Have Sticky Bits Set”, the “OVAL details” section lists the two > directories that failed the check (it’s a little mind boggling that a > scanner would create a finding). So instead, have the option of listing all > directories that were checked and identify which ones passed and failed. > This is what I meant by details. > > Judging by the finding in the referenced check, I know that SCC has been > installed. The details they provide in their report is a good example. The
The result file I used is not from my machine. Sadly I do not have access to SCC. > bad part of that example is separating the passed vs failed by color (I > can’t search by color) and the ability not to be able toggle between all of > the oval details of the check versus just the failed items that caused the > check to fail. This would also be nice for checks that have passed, just to > have the ability to be able to see what files or entries were validated > against the check. This is an interesting feature request but I do not have engineering time for this right now. Please consider opening a ticket on customer portal. -- Martin Preisler -- SCAP Security Guide mailing list scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/
