Waiting for other responses.
Dan White | d_e_wh...@icloud.com
“Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the
universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.” (Bill Waterson: Calvin &
On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Olivier BONHOMME <obonho...@nerim.net> wrote:
Hello the list,
I made that little sheet
https://hosting.ptitoliv.net/owncloud/index.php/s/ZUIwPiXXfvqntA6 where I tried
to map DISA STIG rules against openscap rules located into input/xccdf
I found there were several rules (63) which didn't have a declared OpenSCAP
rule stigid reference but that actually had a matching rule. So I put in front
on these rules a matching OpenSCAP rule.
You can show these rules in the sheet using the following filter :
* Matching rule status : Checked by OB
* Potential OSCAP Matching rule : Everything except "Not Available"
Do you think it is relevant ? If it is, would you accept some PR in order to
update the stigid reference for these rules.
I also detected 76 DISA Rules without any matching test. Is it planned from
scap-security-guide project to create new rules in order to have a complete (or
almost complete) coverage against DISA Stig XCCF ?
Thanks for your answers
scap-security-guide mailing list -- email@example.com
To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org