That may well be, but we shouldn't change Scheme because Bigloo doesn't implement something correctly. That it gets case/eqv? wrong is hardly important, since it gets tail calls wrong too. It's Not Scheme.
Thomas On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Peter Kourzanov <[email protected] > wrote: > Bigloo is, nevertheless an important implementation of a very > Scheme-like (mostly R5RS compliant) language that has an > interpreter, bytecode compiler, C/native, JVM, .NET and Javascript > compilers with FFI support and portable library system. > > On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 11:15 -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Bigloo isn't even trying to be an implementation of Scheme. > > > >
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
