On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Alex Shinn wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Andre van Tonder <[email protected]> wrote:
After years of using Scheme, I have probably encountered LOOP less than 5 times
in someone else's code. Every time I had to go look it up in the standard to
try to figure out what it means. In my opinion, LOOP code is not readable code.
I don't think anyone has any intention of proposing
the CL loop. More likely would be Shiver's loop or
foof-loop (http://mumble.net/~campbell/scheme/foof-loop.txt).
That is in the realm of language design, and would not be, in my opinion,
appropriate for a standardization effort, which should concentrate on
standardizing common usages and practices. See the C.A.R. Hopare quote alluded
to previously.
Andre
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
