Alex Shinn writes: > Hi, thanks for your comments.
Thanks for taking them into account. I will be sending more. I've been reading these reports since R3RS. By the way, the References section still says that Clinger's proper tail recursion paper, [10], is _to appear_ ... in 1998. Is the etiquette such that one replies to the sender and cc's the list? I'm doing a follow-up in Gnus. I hope this keeps the archive properly threaded. > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Jussi Piitulainen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > What exactly is the initial environment (1.3.1. Base and optional > > features; 4.1.3 Procedure calls, beginning of section 6. Standard > > procedures) and what are the optional and required bindings > > (6.6. Eval: scheme-report-environment)? > > The intention was the base script environment was empty, > scheme-report-environment was (scheme base), and repls > were an implementation-defined superset thereof. I've > opened a new ticket for this. Thanks. I'm not sure what a script environment is. Clarify that in the report, too, unless it is something for the large language. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
