Andre van Tonder scripsit: > On p 19 internal syntax definitions are required to precede internal > definitions.
Indeed, I don't know what the justification for that sentence is; it's not something the WG voted on. > This make it impossible to do, e.g., the following: > > (let () > (define-record-type A ....) > (define-record-type B ....) > ....) > > if define-record-type expands into both syntax and variable definitions as in > SRFI 9. To save the appearances, one could construe the rule as applying only to the text before macroexpansion, I suppose. -- John Cowan [email protected] I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, LOTR:FOTR _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
