Aaron W. Hsu writes: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 01:16:03 -0400, John Cowan wrote: > > > MODULE is not a Scheme syntax keyword; you can only bring in > > MODULEs using IMPORT. > > I find this annoying, as it means that at the top-level REPL, we can't > define new modules by entering them on the REPL; or, do I misunderstand > this thread?
Is there anything in the report about how imported modules are found? Obviously (import (scheme io)) refers to a known module, but suppose I had a module of my own. My present understanding is that this is left intentionally unspecified in the small language. It would not be the right balance to specify top-level module definitions in this report but leave the more important library system out. Larger systems can provide both. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
