Andre van Tonder <an...@het.brown.edu> writes: > On Fri, 6 May 2011, John Cowan wrote: > >> Ian Price scripsit: >> >>> "The continuations of all non-final expressions within a sequence of >>> expressions, such as in lambda, begin, let, let*, letrec, letrec*, >>> let-values, let*-values, case, and cond forms, usually take an >>> arbitrary number of values." >> >> Ticket filed. > > Only non-final expressions, though? The specification for begin in the R5RS, R6RS, and the current draft report already permit multiple values in the final expression. I didn't mean to imply that it should be otherwise.
> > I don't like that restriction, because equivalence of the following > two expressions should be to me a fundamental property of BEGIN: > > (begin > (begin > exp1) > exp2)) > > and > > (begin > exp1 > exp2) > > But with ths stated restriction, they are not equivalent. I agree they should be equivalent. Regards, Ian _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
